Martin Amidu Slams Chief Justice for Court Closures Amid Bawku Conflict
Amidu labels the closures “unprecedented” and detrimental to legal processes in a time of political tension
- Amidu argues that closing courts restricts access to justice
- He criticizes the Chief Justice's safety concerns
- Amidu calls for Parliamentary oversight and greater consultation
Former Attorney General Martin Amidu has taken a strong stance against the Chief Justice’s recent decision to close courts in Bawku and the surrounding Upper East region.
He criticized this unprecedented move, labeling it harmful to citizens’ rights and claiming it undermines access to justice.
The Chief Justice defended the closures, citing rising security threats in a memorandum from the Judicial Secretary. However, Amidu dismissed this reasoning as “naïve,” highlighting that Bolgatanga, the regional capital, has historically remained untouched by the violence plaguing Bawku.
“Throughout the Bawku conflict, the regional capital has never been part of the conflict zone,” he stated, emphasizing the serious legal implications of halting court operations just weeks before national elections.
Amidu argued that this move could hinder the judicial review of election matters, infringing on citizens’ rights.
“We the People demand Parliamentary oversight regarding the closure of the High Court in Bolgatanga and its surroundings,” he declared, also raising concerns about the lack of consultation with local legal communities. “The Upper East Regional Bar Association has not convened to endorse this closure,” he pointed out, calling for greater accountability in the decision-making process.
