Bawku Conflict: Calls for Chief Seidu’s Removal Could Spark Violence – Duada
Concerns Over Social Harmony as Traditional Leadership Faces Scrutiny
- Calls for Chief Seidu’s removal threaten to disrupt Bawku’s social cohesion
- Traditional leaders like Chief Seidu provide essential guidance and stability for their communities
- Discussions around legitimacy must align with Ghana’s constitutional standards for chieftaincy
Bawku is facing renewed turmoil as internal conflicts and leadership challenges dominate discussions in this culturally vibrant community.
The traditional leadership, a vital part of Bawku’s identity, is under intense scrutiny.
Dauda Jawara Salifu, spokesperson for the Mamprusi people in Bawku and member of the Nayiri Legal Team, has expressed serious concerns over calls to oust Chief Abagre Seidu, warning that such actions could jeopardize the community’s social harmony.
“Let’s not forget he is a father, grandfather, and the clan’s head; his people rely on his spiritual wisdom and guidance,” Salifu emphasized, highlighting the cultural significance of honoring elders and traditional leaders.
He warned that exiling Chief Seidu could lead to unrest, stating, “You can’t send someone away and expect them not to return. That kind of action could lead to bloodshed.” Salifu pointed out the fragile balance of the community’s social fabric and the risks of conflict arising from a lack of reconciliation.
Salifu anchored his argument in Ghana’s constitutional provisions regarding chieftaincy, particularly Article 277, which outlines the criteria for chieftaincy eligibility. “No one has claimed that Seidu is not from a royal lineage in Bawku or that his installation was against the customs of the Mamprusi,” he clarified, suggesting that the debate surrounding Chief Seidu’s legitimacy is complex.
This escalating situation raises significant questions about the intersection of tradition and legality in Bawku, a community deeply embedded in cultural practices. “When people speak of illegality, are they implying it contradicts Article 277 or other aspects of the Chieftaincy Act?” Salifu asked, emphasizing the need for adherence to established norms.