Bawumia Is Innocent; NPP Had Bad Energy Spiritually – Numerologist Who Predicted Mahama’s Victory
Atta Agyemang attributes Bawumia’s loss to spiritual sabotage within the NPP
- Numerologist Atta Agyemang claims negative spiritual forces and deceptive allies sabotaged Bawumia's campaign
- Despite the loss, Bawumia pledged support for a smooth transition and a stronger NPP comeback
- Agyemang cautions Prophet Kusi Appiah and Maurice Ampaw to brace for spiritual repercussions following their criticism
Ghanaian numerologist Atta Agyemang, who accurately predicted John Dramani Mahama’s electoral triumph in the December 7 elections, has weighed in on Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia’s concession speech.
Following the Vice President’s acknowledgment of defeat and congratulatory call to Mahama, Mr. Agyemang attributed Bawumia’s loss to unfavorable spiritual influences surrounding the NPP.
In a national address on Sunday, December 8, Bawumia emphasized his commitment to a peaceful transition, acknowledging the electorate’s decision.
“The people of Ghana have spoken and voted for change at this time, and we respect that decision with all humility,” he stated, promising that the NPP would return stronger after reflecting on the loss.
Speaking on Lawson TV/Radio Ghana Se Sen Morning Show, Mr. Agyemang asserted that Bawumia was misled by individuals within his circle, claiming they burdened him with negative spiritual energy.
“They deceived him and infected him with bad spirits. Those who took money to assist him spiritually have only harmed him,” he remarked.
He also issued a spiritual warning to critics of his predictions, including Prophet Kusi Appiah and Lawyer Maurice Ampaw, suggesting that their challenges were far from over unless they sought spiritual support.
“Kusi Appiah and Maurice Ampaw mocked my prediction. Kusi Appiah said we will kniw the real Prophets after the election. They should prepare themselves spiritually for what lies ahead,” Mr. Agyemang added.
The Numerologist’s insights reveal his belief that Bawumia was a victim of external forces rather than political failure, urging a broader understanding of the challenges faced during the campaign.
