Justice Suurbaareh Opposes Cap on Supreme Court Justices, Cites Efficiency Concerns
Nominee says limiting judges could slow down justice delivery and burden the apex court
- Opposes capping the number of Supreme Court justices
- Supports flexible appointments
- Urges responsible use of appointment powers
Supreme Court nominee Justice Suurbaareh has voiced strong opposition to proposals aiming to limit the number of justices on Ghana’s highest court, cautioning that such a restriction could undermine the Court’s ability to function effectively.
Speaking before Parliament’s Appointments Committee on Monday, June 16, 2025, Justice Suurbaareh argued in favor of the existing system, which allows for flexibility in appointments to meet the demands of an increasing caseload.
“I don’t believe imposing a cap on the Supreme Court is the right approach,” he stated. “Given the Court’s extensive jurisdiction and heavy workload, such a limit would be counterproductive.”
He emphasized that the discretion to appoint justices should remain with the appointing authority, allowing them to respond dynamically to the needs of the judiciary.
“The current structure empowers the appointing authority to bring in as many justices as needed to ensure justice is delivered efficiently and without delay,” Suurbaareh said.
However, he was clear that this discretion must be exercised with care and responsibility.
“I trust that this power will be used reasonably — not to arbitrarily swell the bench with 20, 30, or 100 justices,” he added.
His remarks come amid ongoing national discussions around judicial reforms and the balance of power in judicial appointments, particularly concerns over executive influence.
