Journalism Today Cheaper, But Less Impactful — Manasseh Azure
Investigative journalist says political influence and partisan focus have weakened the role of the media in Ghana’s development, despite easier access to journalism tools today

- Journalism is more accessible today, but its national impact has declined
- Media is overly focused on NPP-NDC politics, ignoring critical national issues
- Political ownership of media limits press freedom and weakens accountability
Veteran investigative journalist Manasseh Azure Awuni has voiced concerns about the current state of journalism in Ghana, stating that although the cost of doing journalism has decreased over the years, its impact has significantly declined.
Speaking on the Ghana Se Sen Morning Show on Lawson TV/Radio, Manasseh said technological advancements have made it easier and more affordable to practice journalism today compared to previous decades.
“Nowadays, the cost of doing journalism has been lowered compared to the old days,” he noted. However, he argued that this ease has not translated into better journalism or stronger nation-building efforts.
Manasseh, known for his bold and independent reporting, expressed disappointment in the media’s increasing focus on partisan politics.
“When you open your TV and radio set, it’s all about NPP and NDC — not tackling pressing issues in the country,” he said, adding that this trend has weakened the media’s ability to serve as a true watchdog and voice for the people.
Reflecting on the role of the media in Ghana’s political history, Manasseh recalled how journalists were once key players in national transformation.
“Some people used journalists as catalysts to become presidents,” he said. “The media was the mouthpiece during coup d’états, and even today, the government uses it to pass information to the public.”
Despite improvements in media freedom since the return to constitutional rule, Manasseh said that freedom is not absolute.
“The freedom we have today is different from the olden days,” he admitted, but warned that political ownership of media houses has created a new form of constraint.
“If you are a journalist working at a politically affiliated station, you can’t feel free to talk about pressing matters in government if the station supports the sitting government.”
He also rejected claims that journalism standards have completely collapsed but acknowledged that political influence and commercial pressures have affected quality.
“We can’t say the standard of journalism has dropped entirely,” he said, “but politicians who own media houses have contributed to that perception.”
Manasseh stressed the importance of a strong, independent media in reducing corruption and promoting accountability.
“If journalists are to do their work well, corruption would have been reduced, and the government wouldn’t be incurring some unnecessary costs,” he argued.
He called on journalists to rise above political affiliations and prioritize the national interest.
“We could have been doing more than what we have done,” he said, reminding media practitioners of their vital role in shaping the country’s future.